Brand Space VS White Space
By Elisa Rivero
In 1996, the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) created a set of advertising standards that would become the de facto standard for digital advertising. As the internet boomed, these guidelines were essential in bringing order to the ascending digital advertising landscape. Before these standards existed, a chaotic landscape of various sizes and formats made workflows burdensome. In 2003, these standards received a minor update. However, as we sit in an era where technology changes at an unprecedented rate, a glaring oversight casts a darkening shadow over the advertising industry: Our ad standards have remained stagnant since its inception—twenty-five years, to be exact.
Consider the remarkable shift in technology since these standards were conceived. In 2000, a mere three years before the IAB’s last significant update, 75% of internet users operated on browsers with pixel densities less than 1024×768. Today, the average monitor boasts a pixel density of 1920×1080, with nearly half of all users exceeding this resolution. This shift is not just in numbers but is indicative of a dramatic change in the quality and capabilities of display technology.
Yet, despite this tremendous progression, the ad industry’s standardization has clung to archaic specifications that render advertisements awkwardly on modern web pages. For example, if one were to place a leaderboard ad designed for older standards onto a contemporary website, the result would be a visual discrepancy that is both jarring and indicative of a misalignment with current technology. This detracts from the user experience, undermines the ad’s potential impact, and hurts the brand.
The industry’s inability to update these standards has coincided with declining ad performance benchmarks. The advent of the iPhone, a seminal moment in computing, brought the demise of Flash—a platform once synonymous with online ads. Its disappearance marked a shift towards performance media, which saw a rapid ascent. Agencies that struggled or failed to transition from Flash to the more modern HTML5 standard found themselves in a creative quagmire, unable to harness the full potential of the new medium.This technical inertia is rife with irony.
Studies by authoritative entities like Nielsen and Comscore have repeatedly demonstrated that high-quality creative content is four times more effective than even the most targeted media placement. Despite this, agencies continue to invest, albeit inadvertently, in what can be termed ‘WHITE SPACE’ rather than ‘BRAND SPACE.’ This WHITE SPACE often dominates the screen, becoming the most prominent feature rather than the brand’s message that it was supposed to frame and amplify.
The ramifications of this are threefold: first, it highlights a misallocation of resources where investment in ad space does not translate to adequate brand visibility; second, it presents a user experience that is cluttered with non-optimized advertisements, which, rather than engaging potential customers, may serve to alienate them. Thirdly, these low-performing units make it no longer fiscally responsible for buying audiences.
The advertising industry must confront this head-on. We must revisit and revise the IAB ad standards to align with current screen resolutions and user habits and ensure that these standards are adaptable to future technological advances. Agencies need to harness the power of modern creative tools, leveraging the potential of HTML5 and beyond, to craft compelling advertisements that resonate with consumers and occupy the digital space as intended—not as relics of a bygone era but as dynamic actors in the interactive narrative of the internet. Only then can the ad industry hope to reclaim the potency and relevance of BRAND SPACE in the digital domain.
Related posts
